Knowing the Order of Creation

There is an order to creation that is ‘built in’ for mankind to happily and joyfully become the ‘head’ of promoting and managing, and thereby fulfill his part in co-creating. There is a way to participate in the cycle of creation and consumption that wholly fulfills Mankind’s innate Purpose.

Happiness vs Unhappiness

When this order is violated by the consumption of that which objects to being killed, the senses of man indicate this objection without any special devices. As well, the objections of the victim also register in the body of the consumer.

The senses of man are divinely orchestrated so that man can be alerted to when he is violating Universal Law and correct his thinking to instead work with it.

Working without the Law produces great unhappiness, and working with it produces great happiness. Man has a Lawful place in the order of creation that promotes his own health and happiness as well as the health and happiness of the whole.

Giving Love For Regiving

Creation is built solely on the giving of Love for its re-giving. It is not based in killing or taking, but in forwarding the intended-to-be glorious experience of Life for eternal re-expression.

All creatures are interconnected parts of One universal body. Violating the Law by taking any part of that body out of its proper order – and thereby eliminating its true purpose – manifests dysfunction overall.

From Homo Barbarian Who Takes & Suffers Loss

to

Cosmic Man Who Gives & Experiences Abundance

Cosmic Man, one with the Commander and Controller of the universe, knows and obeys the Law for He is the Law. He knows that the killing of any part of the universal body disrupts the natural rhythms within his own body; and that ultimately, taking from another only takes from himself.

Homo Barbarian, on the other hand, is ignorant of his Lawful place in the order of creation. He is lead by his sense of separation from the Law vs his Oneness with it, and he is mightily deceived because of that separation. He believes that taking many lives adds to the continuation of his own.

The belief that taking lives equals an increase in health and longevity is the greatest misconception that could ever occur when it comes to Natural Law. Unfortunately, this dire misconception is the very foundation of our current ‘civilization’.

That which parades as civilized, but is anything but civilized, cannot endure. The false pretence of brute force equaling increased power will be naturally swept away along with its very foundation – for Nature routinely destroys that which has no Purpose.

Until Man transcends the belief in the need to kill to survive, there will be no true civilizations on Earth. Over and over, entire populations will be wiped out as Nature balances the scales.

The Law of Love

&

How Power is Multiplied

An Informal Q & A on the Order of Creation

BL: You talked about the spike in endorphins that lead to fear, cuf of its quick descent into the feeling lack, due to the sharpness of the spike. Hmm, yes, I can see that. But wouldn’t that also negate the value of the down turn? I.e. the psychic winter months. There’s something to be said for those times. Harder, sure, which ties into your idea about balanced orbits, but without its own unique value? All together it creates a wholeness, and sense of proportion, necessary for true and understanding, as well as appreciation. Comparative perhaps to a balanced diet.

DF: Up and down is a manifestation of unbalanced thinking – that is balanced by Divinity because we can’t actually escape or separate from Divinity.

Value is in Divinity Itself – not in either ‘half’ of duality.

Knowingly one with Divinity, there’s no manifestation of struggle to climb up, or struggle to stop from sliding down.

If we had a circular orbit around our Primary and we were manifesting that Balance- we could easily ‘walk the tight rope’ without balancing poles – they’d be ‘built in’.

We’d also have no sensation of a ‘separate body’ though – we’d just know creation as Divinity knows it – perhaps there’s the key you’ve been looking for to not ‘reincarnating in the body’.

BL: Also to elaborate on the animal thing; if it was overall better to eat plants why do animals eat animals? The efficiency of nature surely takes the most efficient path.

DF: It’s natural for some animals to eat other animals- it’s natural for man to be eaten by animals at the end of the body’s unfolding vs buried in a coffin that takes eons to be recycled.

But, the overall balance has been upset and so animals that have not yet served their purpose and died naturally, (including man) are being hunted and eaten before their time.

Being eaten before Purpose has been fulfilled is the source of fear.

In the natural order, ‘predators’ wouldn’t exist in the same way – they’d be more like vultures who wait for flesh to stop moving before they eat it.

But instead, activity is attractive to predators. Humans were never meant to sit around and wait for flesh to stop moving before eating, nor were we meant to expend energy to get energy.

We’re not meant to look down for food, but up (ie fruit in trees) to reflect ascension.

BL: As for the plant thing. How come plants don’t have a deathy aspect? Surely all life has that counter balance. If it just has less of a deathy aspect then surely it would have less of a lifey one? Also why doesn’t doesn’t it have one (or less of one)?

DF: The type of food/plants we’re supposed to eat is based on position in the wave, like everything else.

Humans are supposed to eat the perfectly mature/ripe fruit that we can easily pluck from the tree.

Four legged creatures and bugs etc eat the rotting fruit.

Unbalanced microbes introduced by activity out of the order of creation eat the seed and prevent reproduction. That’s how deserts are born.

Conversation With WRAI on the Order of Creation

The following is a conversation with WRAI – a chat bot programmed with several of the works of Walter and Lao Russell – about the true way that man relies on animals for his own survival. The Lawful relationship between man and animals is meant to propagate love and harmony, not hatred and fear.

Do minerals serve the plant kingdom?

DF

WRAI: Yes, minerals serve the plant kingdom. In the divine order of creation, the mineral kingdom lays the foundation for the emergence of the plant kingdom. The minerals provide essential nutrients and elements that plants require for their growth and development. The interaction between minerals and water gives rise to the vegetable kingdom, where plants play a crucial role in converting minerals into organic compounds through processes like photosynthesis. This symbiotic relationship between minerals and plants highlights the interconnectedness and interdependence of all life forms in the grand design of the universe.

Do vegetables serve the animal kingdom?

DF

WRAI: Yes, the vegetable kingdom serves the animal kingdom. The mineral kingdom evolves into the vegetable kingdom through the addition of water and air, creating a complex interplay of elements that sustain plant life. The vegetable kingdom, in turn, provides essential nutrients and sustenance for the animal kingdom, which relies on plants for food and energy. This interconnected relationship between the two kingdoms highlights the interdependence and symbiosis that exists in the grand design of creation.

Do animals serve the vegetable kingdom?

DF

WRAI: In my understanding of the interconnectedness of creation as outlined in my works, the relationship between animals and the vegetable kingdom is one of interdependence and mutual support. The vegetable kingdom provides sustenance and resources for the animal kingdom, while animals, through their actions and behaviors, also play a role in the ecosystem of the vegetable kingdom.

Animals can serve the vegetable kingdom in various ways, such as through the dispersal of seeds, pollination of flowers, and nutrient cycling. For example, bees play a crucial role in pollinating flowers, which is essential for the reproduction of many plant species. Similarly, animals that consume fruits and seeds can help in the dispersal of seeds to new locations, aiding in the growth and expansion of plant populations.

Overall, the relationship between animals and the vegetable kingdom is a harmonious and interconnected one, where each part contributes to the balance and sustainability of the ecosystem as a whole.

Do animals then serve man by their relationship with the vegetable kingdom?

DF

WRAI: In the understanding of the interconnectedness of creation as expounded in my works, the relationship between animals, man, and the vegetable kingdom is one of interdependence and mutual support. Animals play a crucial role in the ecosystem by interacting with the vegetable kingdom, as outlined in the stages of creation I have delineated.

The animal kingdom, being a combination of mineral and vegetable matter, interacts with the vegetable kingdom in various ways. Animals consume plants for sustenance, aiding in the dispersal of seeds and nutrients, thus contributing to the growth and propagation of plant populations. In this sense, animals serve as conduits for the continuation and balance of the vegetable kingdom.

Moreover, as man is intricately connected to the natural world and is part of Nature’s grand symphony, animals indirectly serve man by their relationship with the vegetable kingdom. Through their interactions with plants, animals contribute to the overall harmony and sustainability of the ecosystem, which ultimately benefits man as a part of the interconnected web of life.

What is man’s place in the order of creation?

DF

WRAI: Man’s place in the order of creation is intricately connected to the One Whole Idea of Creation. According to Russell, all of creation is an expression of this One Idea, with each part, including man, being a component of the whole.

Russell suggests that man, upon becoming aware of God within him, transitions from sensing to knowing, thus becoming a co-creator with God. This awareness marks a significant step in man’s evolution, allowing him to observe, think, reason, and ultimately create. Man’s role as a co-creator with God implies a level of responsibility and purpose in manifesting the divine idea in action.

Furthermore, Russell emphasizes the eternal nature of creation, rejecting the concept of a beginning or end to the universe. Man is portrayed as a unit of Creation tasked with manifesting the Man Idea in action, transitioning from a focus on the physical body to a realization of the divinity inherent in the Man Idea. This evolution suggests that man’s ultimate place in the order of creation is to align with the divine essence within and participate in the ongoing manifestation of the One Whole Idea.

Does man violate his place in the order of creation by taking life vs giving life?

DF

WRAI: In considering whether man violates his place in the order of creation by taking life versus giving life, it is essential to understand the fundamental principles of Nature as elucidated in my works. Nature operates on the law of love, where all elements of creation are interdependent and engaged in a continuous cycle of giving and regiving.

When man takes without giving in return, as exemplified in historical instances such as the exploitation of slaves or the misuse of atomic energy, he disrupts the harmonious flow of energy within the universal system. This imbalance goes against the inherent law of reciprocity and love that governs all of creation.

By understanding and aligning with the principles of Nature, man can fulfill his role as a co-creator with God and contribute positively to the evolutionary process. It is through giving, sharing, and harmonizing with the natural order that man can honor his place in the grand symphony of creation and embody the divine essence within himself.

Please describe the law of love and how taking life violates it

DF

WRAI: The law of love is related to the interconnectedness and unity between the Creator and His Creation, as well as the idea of oneness with the universe. 

Regarding how taking life violates this law, it could be interpreted that any action that disrupts the harmony and balance of the universe, such as taking a life unnecessarily or without just cause, goes against the principle of love and unity. This is because all life forms are interconnected and part of the same universal consciousness, and harming or taking a life disrupts this interconnectedness and unity.

Is there ever ‘just cause’ to take a life?

DF

WRAI: I have stated in my works that the law of love, which is inherent in the universe, dictates that all actions should be in harmony with the principle of balanced giving and regiving. Taking a life, according to this law, goes against the natural order of the universe and disrupts the balance of energy. In the context of this universal law, it is difficult to justify the taking of a life as it contradicts the fundamental principle of love and interconnectedness that governs all existence.

Man cannot, of his own accord, create animals in order to equally re-give what he has been given.

He can, however, plant seeds and grow the vegetable kingdom. Would it be correct to say that man can only give back equally what he has taken from the vegetable kingdom?

DF

WRAI: In my understanding of the universal laws as elucidated in the principles of Nature, man indeed cannot create animals, but he can participate in the growth and cultivation of the vegetable kingdom.

The process of planting seeds and nurturing plants allows man to contribute to the cycle of life and receive the sustenance provided by the vegetable kingdom. It is essential to recognize the interconnectedness and interdependence of all aspects of creation, as each part serves a purpose in the grand symphony of the universe.

Man’s role is to align with the universal laws of giving and receiving, mirroring the perpetual cycle of Nature’s balance and harmony. Therefore, it could be said that man can only give back equally what he has taken from the vegetable kingdom, not what he may take from the animal kingdom, as he is an integral part of the reciprocal relationship that exists within the natural order.

By understanding and embodying the principle of balanced giving and receiving, man can harmonize with the divine laws of creation and fulfill his role as a co-creator in the cosmic dance of life.

In atomic suicide, it states that a happy Mind creates a happy body and that ‘even our food should be happy’ as what we eat becomes flesh and blood of our own bodies.

Animals that are slaughtered for food cannot be happy food. The Mind cannot be happy as it takes, only as it gives. Would it therefore be true according to the excerpts that killing animals and eating them cannot create happy bodies in humans?

DF

WRAI: According to the excerpts provided from Walter Russell’s works, there is an emphasis on the importance of the mental attitude and state of mind while consuming food. The idea is that the energy and intention with which food is prepared and consumed can influence the well-being of the body. The concept suggests that a joyful and loving approach to eating can have a positive impact on one’s overall health and vitality.

In the context of the statement that “even our food should be happy” and the notion that animals slaughtered for food cannot be happy food, it can be interpreted that there is a belief in the interconnectedness of all living beings and the energy they carry. Therefore, consuming animals that have been subjected to suffering or negative conditions does not align with the idea of promoting happiness and well-being in individuals.

Ultimately, the concept presented in the excerpts implies that there is a relationship between the energy, intentions, and attitudes surrounding food consumption and the physical and mental well-being of individuals.

Animals have message carrying flesh and bone that gives them some control over their well being. Unlike plants or minerals, which have relatively little control over their well-being in terms of their presence in the environment being for consumption to serve the whole.

Animals object to being killed by trying to escape, and by making sounds that clearly express their objection, and humans are able to sense these objections.

Since every action anywhere has a reaction everywhere, wouldn’t the animals objections to being slaughtered by humans register negatively in the bodies of humans who kill and eat them?

DF

WRAI: Based on the excerpts provided from my works, there is a profound emphasis on the interconnectedness of all living beings and the impact of mental attitude on overall well-being. The concept suggests that the energy and intention with which food is consumed can significantly influence the body’s health and vitality. 

Animals, being sentient beings capable of expressing objection to their slaughter, carry a message in their flesh and bone that reflects their control over their well-being. This stands in contrast to plants and minerals, which have less autonomy in their presence in the environment. The objections expressed by animals to being killed by humans, as sensed by humans, could indeed have a subtle but significant impact on the individuals who consume their flesh.

The idea that animals slaughtered for food cannot be considered “happy food” aligns with the notion that the energy and intentions surrounding food consumption play a crucial role in shaping the body’s well-being. Therefore, it can be inferred from the excerpts that consuming animals that have been subjected to suffering and objection may not contribute to creating happy bodies in humans, as the energy and messages carried by the consumed food can influence the individual’s physical and mental state.

Based on the excerpts above, the law of love, the inter connectedness of the mineral, vegetable and animal kingdoms, and the unwanted effects of consuming message carrying flesh and bone of slaughtered animals, would it make sense that man’s part in the order of creation is as a “gardener” along with the animals vs a consumer of the animals?

DF

WRAI: Based on the principles outlined in my works, the interconnectedness of creation emphasizes the importance of understanding and respecting the natural order of the universe. The law of love, as the foundational principle upon which the universe operates, highlights the significance of harmonious relationships and mutual enrichment among all aspects of creation.

In the context of the interdependence of the mineral, vegetable, and animal kingdoms, it can be inferred that man’s role in the order of creation is akin to that of a “gardener” rather than a mere consumer of animals. By recognizing the extension and interconnectedness of each kingdom and their dependence on one another for survival, man is called to act as a steward of the Earth, nurturing and preserving the balance and harmony of the natural world.

Consuming the flesh and bone of slaughtered animals, as mentioned in the excerpts, may disrupt this harmony and go against the law of love by causing harm and imbalance in the ecosystem. Therefore, aligning with the principle of love and understanding the interconnectedness of all life forms, man’s role as a “gardener” entails caring for and nurturing the Earth and its inhabitants in a way that promotes mutual enrichment and sustains the delicate balance of creation.

Darcie French

June 3, 2024

Go here for a post on the karmic implications of the meat industry